MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334550270 · doi:10.9790/1684-0162840

Staff Scheduling in Health Care Systems

2012· article· en· W2334550270 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIOSR Journal of Mechanical and Civil Engineering · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldDecision Sciences
TopicScheduling and Timetabling Solutions
Canadian institutionsSt. Francis Xavier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNurse scheduling problemScheduling (production processes)Computer scienceFair-share schedulingMATLABDynamic priority schedulingMathematical optimizationJob shop schedulingOperations researchTwo-level schedulingHealth careRate-monotonic schedulingDistributed computingMathematicsOperating systemScheduleEconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Staff scheduling is found as a crucial part of staff management. Every scheduling problem is different from each other when considering the various constraints, which leads to the staff scheduling problem becoming more complex. This paper deals with Genetic Algorithm (GA) approach to solve a specific Staff Scheduling Problem. The schedules are planned for 4 weeks with 30 numbers of nurses in the ward and each working day consists of 5 different shift types. Penalty is presented to indicate the level of importance for the constraints involved that are hard constraints and soft constraints. For solving the problem of scheduling, GUI is being introduced for the user friendly approach through MATLAB Version 7.10.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.226
Threshold uncertainty score0.319

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.329
Teacher spread0.277 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it