MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334557811 · doi:10.1021/am3015197

Boron Subphthalocyanines as Organic Electronic Materials

2012· article· en· W2334557811 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueACS Applied Materials & Interfaces · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicPorphyrin and Phthalocyanine Chemistry
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOLEDMaterials scienceOrganic electronicsOrganic semiconductorNanotechnologyElectronicsOrganic solar cellBoronElectronic materialsOptoelectronicsPolymerOrganic chemistryTransistorChemistryElectrical engineeringPhysical chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Boron subphthalocyanines (BsubPcs) are an emerging class of high performing materials in organic electronics. Since the first use of chloroboron subphthalocyanine in an organic electronic device 6 years ago subphthalocyanines have shown potential as functional materials in organic light emitting diodes (OLEDs) and organic photovoltaics (OPVs). Here we review the material properties of chloroboron subphthalocyanine (Cl-BsubPc) and its use as an organic semiconductor. We then highlight our efforts toward derivatives of boron subpthalocyanine beyond Cl-BsubPc and discuss the impact of molecular design on the material properties and the performance of the BsubPc. Finally, we comment on the status of BsubPcs in the field of organic electronics and discuss how we believe future progress can be made.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0370.008

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.240
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it