MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334664297 · doi:10.1109/tvt.2015.2417568

Closed-Form Average SNR and Ergodic Capacity Approximations for Best Relay Selection

2015· article· en· W2334664297 on OpenAlexaff
Qian Wang, Yindi Jing

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCooperative Communication and Network Coding
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsErgodic theoryRelayCumulative distribution functionSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Probability density functionMathematicsExpression (computer science)Selection (genetic algorithm)Topology (electrical circuits)Capacity planningApplied mathematicsFunction (biology)Power (physics)Statistical physicsMathematical optimizationComputer scienceStatisticsMathematical analysisPhysicsCombinatorics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This work analyses the average signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and ergodic capacity of large-scale relay networks with best relay selection (BRS). First, extreme value theory (EVT) is used to obtain an implicit expression for the asymptotic cumulative distribution function (cdf) of the received SNR when the number of relays is high. Then, via high power approximations, closed-form expressions for the cdf and probability density function (pdf) of the received SNR are achieved, from which closed-form expressions of the average received SNR and ergodic capacity are derived. Insights on the array gain and ergodic capacity behavior of BRS can be observed from the derived results. Simulations show that the derived approximations are tight, even for not-so-large relay networks.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.882
Threshold uncertainty score0.627

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Vehicular TechnologySame topicCooperative Communication and Network CodingFrench-language works237,207