MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Current understanding of neuroprotection in glaucoma

2002· review· en· W2334742250 on OpenAlexaff
Francine Wein, Leonard A. Levin

Bibliographic record

VenueCurrent Opinion in Ophthalmology · 2002
Typereview
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGlaucoma and retinal disorders
Canadian institutionsMcGill University Health Centre
FundersNational Eye InstituteNational Institutes of HealthResearch to Prevent Blindness
KeywordsNeuroprotectionMedicineOptic neuropathyGlaucomaOptic nerveRetinal ganglion cellGanglionNeuroscienceRetinalRetinaOphthalmologyAnatomyBiologyInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The most common optic neuropathy is glaucomatous optic neuropathy, distinguished by a distinctive and progressive excavation of the optic nerve head without significant pallor of the remaining neuroretinal rim. Neuroprotection is a novel strategy for treating disorders that affect the nervous system by preventing death of neurons. In glaucomatous optic neuropathy, the neurons that die are retinal ganglion cells. This article reviews the recent basic science relevant to neuroprotection, particularly with respect to retinal ganglion cell death in glaucomatous and other optic neuropathies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.897
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.218
GPT teacher head0.422
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations46
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCurrent Opinion in OphthalmologySame topicGlaucoma and retinal disordersFrench-language works237,207