MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2334799612 · doi:10.1021/ie2029656

Analysis of Melt Flow Mixing in Czochralski Crystal Growth Process

2012· article· en· W2334799612 on OpenAlexaff
Mojtaba Izadi, Stevan Dubljević

Bibliographic record

VenueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Research · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicQuantum chaos and dynamical systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrucible (geodemography)Mixing (physics)Flow (mathematics)Melt flow indexCrystal (programming language)Process (computing)Fluid dynamicsMaterials scienceCrystal growthMechanicsTransport phenomenaHeat transferConvectionRotational symmetryChemistryCrystallographyComputer scienceComposite materialPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The prime example of a relevant industrial process in which fluid flow dynamics impacts desired process specifications is given by the Czochralski (CZ) crystal growth process. Melt flow in the crucible induces a variety of transport phenomena with profound effects on the mass, momentum, and heat transfer during the process. To provide novel insight into the transport phenomena associated with the CZ process melt flow, the approach of discerning the mixing templates by identifying Lagrangian coherent structures (LCS) is explored. In particular, the LCS have been extracted to identify transport features in the melt during the crystal growth. The finite-element method has been employed to simulate realistic axisymmetric melt flow accounting for physically relevant geometries (including the melt–crystal and melt–ambient interfaces) for identification of the LCS. These structures are known to represent dynamically driven material surfaces, and they provide insight into mixing properties of the melt flow that influence the characteristics of the grown crystal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.423
Threshold uncertainty score0.607

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.050
GPT teacher head0.331
Teacher spread0.281 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry ResearchSame topicQuantum chaos and dynamical systemsFrench-language works237,207