MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Sensory Nerve Action Potentials Are Lower In Women With Arthritis Of The Hand

2011· article· en· W2334810272 on OpenAlexaff
Kristina M. Calder, Alison Martin, Jessica Lydiate, Jean Wessel, Joy C. MacDermid, Victoria Galea, Norma J. MacIntyre

Bibliographic record

VenueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Canadian institutionsMcMaster University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSnapMedicineRheumatoid arthritisSensationStimulationSensory systemSensory nerveWristStimulus (psychology)Median nerveOsteoarthritisUlnar nerveAnalysis of varianceUpper limbRadial nerveAnesthesiaPhysical therapyInternal medicinePhysical medicine and rehabilitationElbowSurgeryPsychologyNeurosciencePathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Persons with osteoarthritis (OA) or rheumatoid arthritis (RA) of the hand can have significant difficulty performing daily activities. It has been hypothesized that the disability is primarily related to pain. However, the contributions of sensory impairments to disability have not been fully explored in persons with arthritis of the hand. PURPOSE: To determine if women with arthritis of the hand have sensory impairments of the hand compared to healthy control subjects. METHODS: Eleven women with symptomatic hand OA, seven women with hand RA and nine healthy women control subjects were recruited. Sensation was evaluated by measuring sensory nerve action potentials (SNAP) from the median, ulnar and radial nerves of the dominant hand. The stimulus was increased incrementally until the SNAP amplitude reached its maximum point. Supramaximal stimulation was set to 120% of this intensity, and ten readings of each nerve were obtained and averaged. Two-way repeated-measures ANOVAs were used to compare group by stimulation site (nerve) for SNAP latency, conduction velocity and amplitude. RESULTS: The SNAP amplitudes of the OA and RA groups were significantly lower than the SNAP amplitudes of the control group for the median (OA 29.7±10.0 μV; RA 29.5±12.0 μV; control 43.6±20.8 μV), ulnar (OA 26.2±17.4 μV; RA 34.4±20.5 μV; control 49.5±25.0 μV) and radial (OA 35.2±13.7 μV; RA 30.3±11.2 μV; control 46.5±15.0 μV) nerves (p < 0.05). No differences were found between the groups for SNAP latency and conduction velocity. CONCLUSION: Women with hand OA and RA have reduced SNAP amplitudes in the medial, radial and ulnar distributions of the hand. The SNAP amplitudes represent the number of active sensory nerve fibers. Therefore, lower amplitude will correspond with a decreased number of active fibers. The pattern of SNAP amplitude reduction with conserved latency and conduction velocity is typically associated with axonal loss lesions, and differentiates them from demyelinating neuropathies. While there may be fewer total nerve fibers firing, the remaining intact fibers have normal nerve conduction. The findings from this study suggest that women with hand OA and RA may have axonal loss of sensory fibers in the median, ulnar and radial nerves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.239 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMedicine & Science in Sports & Exercise→Same topicOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation→French-language works237,207→