Impact of Direct Vertebral Body Derotation on Rib Prominence
Bibliographic record
Abstract
STUDY DESIGN: Multicenter retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: To determine the extent of rib deformity correction that can be expected with direct vertebral body derotation (DVBD) and investigate factors that may correlate with improved rib deformity correction. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: DVBD is a powerful tool in the surgical correction of axial rotation in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis. The application of DVBD has decreased the use of thoracoplasty for cosmetic rib deformity correction, but the outcomes of DVBD without adjuvant thoracoplasty have not been well defined. METHODS: A multicenter database was retrospectively queried to identify patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis who underwent posterior spinal fusion with at least 2 years of follow-up and Lenke type 1 to 3 curves. All patients had undergone DVBD maneuvers during their surgery, and patients having undergone concurrent thoracoplasty were excluded from the study. The absolute change and percentage change from preoperative inclinometer readings were correlated with preoperative clinical and radiographic data. RESULTS: A total of 148 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The mean age was 14.7 ± 2.1 years with a mean primary thoracic curve of 55.3° ± 9.3°. The mean preoperative inclinometer reading was 14.8° ± 4.5°, which reduced to 7.5° ± 4.0° postoperatively. Patients had a mean improvement of 54% ± 29% in rib prominence using DVBD. We attempted to correlate 23 of the most commonly used preoperative clinical, radiographic, and operative measures with postoperative inclinometer improvement. Interestingly, none correlated with rib deformity correction, including preoperative rib deformity (P = 0.16), thoracic curve flexibility (P = 0.71), presence of osteotomies (P = 0.60), and thoracic curve magnitude (P = 0.78). CONCLUSION: Utilizing DVBD, the surgeon can expect approximately 50% reduction in the rib deformity as assessed by inclinometer. This is irrespective of preoperative inclinometer measures, thoracic curve flexibility, and vertebral body rotation on standing and bending radiographs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".