Le système québécois d’aide et de soins aux personnes âgées
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since the early 1970s, Canada has had a public health system that guarantees free, universal access to hospital and medical services to all Canadians. The same values and principles have governed the organization of Quebec’s health and social services, including long-term care and services. Over the years, there have been changes within the Quebec system in order to better adapt services to new realities. There has been a diversification of services with greater emphasis on support for persons in the community and provision of services close to people’s living environment. Mechanisms have also been established to improve clinical evaluation of the needs of individuals and systematize the referral and admission to residential centres. Nevertheless, adjustments are needed to address emerging trends in changing needs: increased needs due to the substantial rise in the number of elderly persons but also needs that are different from those of the younger population for whom the system was designed. The new Quebec policy on long-term care is based on a different conception of the organization of services for elderly persons with decreasing autonomy and on the assumption that there will be major changes in the way things are done.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".