MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Digital Atlanta: A collaborative approach to remapping Atlanta's past

2015· article· en· W2335053068 on OpenAlexaff
Michael Page, Joe Hurley, Brennan Collins, Jeffrey Glover, Robert Bryant, Emily Clark, Marni Davis, Randy Gue, Sarah Melton, Ben Miller, Matthew Lawrence Pierce, Megan Slemons, Jay Varner, Robin Wharton

Bibliographic record

Venue2015 Digital Heritage · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital and Traditional Archives Management
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAtlantaDigital collectionsState (computer science)Computer scienceWorld Wide WebLibrary scienceRegional scienceArchaeologyGeographyMetropolitan area

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper brings together scholars from English, History, Archaeology, Library Sciences, and Urban Geography from Georgia State and Emory Universities to discuss our efforts in creating regional synergy around digital projects that explore Atlanta's past through digital map collections, geodatabases, spatial history tools and web applications, public-oriented digital publications, and 3D gaming environments.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.034
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.010
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0100.009
Science and technology studies0.0080.003
Scholarly communication0.0100.006
Open science0.0020.015
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.219
Teacher spread0.181 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2015 Digital HeritageSame topicDigital and Traditional Archives ManagementFrench-language works237,207