MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

American Society of Clinical Oncology Position Statement on Obesity and Cancer

2015· article· en· W2335182758 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer A. Ligibel, Catherine M. Alfano, Kerry S. Courneya, Wendy Demark‐Wahnefried, Robert A. Burger, Rowan T. Chlebowski, Carol J. Fabian, Ayca Gucalp, Dawn L. Hershman, Melissa M. Hudson, Lee W. Jones, Madhuri Kakarala, Kirsten K. Ness, Janette K. Merrill, Dana S. Wollins, Clifford A. Hudis

Bibliographic record

VenueObstetrical & Gynecological Survey · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicMetabolism, Diabetes, and Cancer
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineTeachable momentCancerObesityDiseaseInternal medicineDiabetes mellitusIntensive care medicineOncology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Over the last 3 decades, the prevalence of obesity in the United States and globally has increased dramatically. More than one third of US adults and 17% of US children and adolescents are categorized as obese. In addition to its well-known risk for heart disease and diabetes, obesity is also a major risk factor for cancer. Increasing evidence has linked obesity to elevated risk of cancer, recurrence, and cancer-related mortality among individuals with early-stage disease. Obese individuals have a worse prognosis after a cancer diagnosis. Obesity can interfere with the delivery of systemic therapy, contribute to morbidity of cancer treatment, and may increase the risk of second malignancies and comorbidities. A cancer diagnosis may serve as a teachable moment to motivate obese individuals to implement a risk-reducing or health-protective lifestyle. Oncology care providers and the oncology team have a close relationship with patients during the critical period after a cancer diagnosis and are in a unique position to help patients lose weight and make other healthy lifestyle changes. The American Society of Clinical Oncology has established a multifaceted initiative to address the burden imparted by obesity on individual cancer patients and society. Major elements of this initiative include the following: (1) increase both provider and patient core knowledge of current evidence on the role of energy balance in cancer risk and prevention; (2) provide guidance, tools, and resources to oncology providers to allow them to use the most appropriate methods based on current knowledge to help cancer patients make needed changes in lifestyle behaviors; (3) build and foster a robust research agenda to study the pathophysiology of energy balance alterations, to investigate whether changes in lifestyle after diagnosis (dietary, weight loss, exercise) will improve prognosis, and to find the best methods to help cancer survivors initiate and maintain lifestyle changes; and (4) advocate and promote policy and systems change that address societal factors contributing to obesity and improve access of cancer patients to weight management services. Obesity is a complex condition and disease and a multifaceted societal problem with many contributing factors. It will take significant time and effort to reduce the incidence of overweight and obesity. Concerted action by oncologists, other health providers, and organizations, as well as patients and their families, is needed to convert growing knowledge of the relationship between obesity and cancer into meaningful action.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.625
Threshold uncertainty score0.540

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.153
GPT teacher head0.418
Teacher spread0.266 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueObstetrical & Gynecological SurveySame topicMetabolism, Diabetes, and CancerFrench-language works237,207