Bibliographic record
Abstract
製紙工程中の枠換えでは，枠換え効率の向上や収益に直接寄与する損紙の低減が叫ばれている。弊社が取り扱うカナダ，パプリマ社の全自動枠換え装置（商品名「リールジェット」及び「リールジェットS」）は，高圧水（1，100～1，500bar／20～25cc）を使用してシートセンターでテールあるいはテールチップを2本のウォータージェット・ノズルで切り出し，テールあるいはテールチップが新スプールに巻き取られると同時にそれらを高速（2～10m／秒）でシート全幅方向に展開し，巻ムラの無いスムーズで滑らかな枠換えを実現している。この枠換え装置により，ユーザーは枠換え効率の向上はもとより，枠換え時の損紙を著しく低減して利益として回収できるため，短期間での設備コストの償却が可能となっている。本装置を採用した欧米の顧客からは，その確実な枠換えパーフォーマンスに，そして著しい損紙削減率と生産性の向上に絶賛を頂いている。現在，欧州，米国，中国を中心に実績を伸ばしここ一年間で22台（2007年6月現在合計42台，日本国内実績を含む）と実績を伸長する枠換え装置の概要を紹介する。
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.005 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.064 | 0.017 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".