MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335205123 · doi:10.1021/ma300432c

Covalent Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with Thermoresponsive Core Cross-Linked Polymeric Micelles

2012· article· en· W2335205123 on OpenAlexaff
Yonggui Li, Duanguang Yang, Alex Adronov, Yong Gao, Xujun Luo, Huaming Li

Bibliographic record

VenueMacromolecules · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicCarbon Nanotubes in Composites
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityBrockhouse Institute for Materials Research
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCopolymerSurface modificationMicelleCovalent bondMaterials sciencePolymer chemistryCarbon nanotubeRaftAzidePolymerizationReversible addition−fragmentation chain-transfer polymerizationPolymerChain transferChemical engineeringAqueous solutionChemistryRadical polymerizationNanotechnologyOrganic chemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A facile method for the covalent functionalization of single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWNTs) with thermoresponsive core cross-linked (CCL) polymeric micelles is presented. This method is based on SWNT functionalization as well as polymer self-assembly. The copolymer, poly( N,N -dimethylacrylamide)- b -poly( N -isopropylacrylamide- co - N -acryloxysuccinimide) (PDMA- b -P(NIPAM- co -NAS)), bearing an azide group at the PDMA end, was first prepared by reversible addition–fragmentation chain transfer (RAFT) polymerization. Covalent functionalization of SWNTs with well-defined, azide-derivatized PDMA- b -P(NIPAM- co -NAS) was then accomplished by a nitrene addition reaction. The copolymer-functionalized SWNTs (f-SWNTs) consisted of about 26 wt % copolymer and exhibited relatively high solubility in water. Subsequently, the coassembly of the copolymer and f-SWNT blends was carried out in aqueous solution. It was found that the copolymer chains grafted onto the surface of SWNTs were coassembled with the free chains in solution, leading to thermoresponsive polymeric micelles that adhered to the surface of nanotubes. Upon cross-linking, the copolymer aggregates were stabilized and covalently anchored to SWNTs (SWNT-micelle). The resulting assembled nanostructures were still soluble in water and were characterized by atomic force microscopy (AFM) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.895

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations32
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMacromoleculesSame topicCarbon Nanotubes in CompositesFrench-language works237,207