MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335306593 · doi:10.7566/jpscp.6.020036

Scattering of Halo Nuclei at Energies below and around the Coulomb Barrier

2015· article· en· W2335306593 on OpenAlexaff
M. J. G. Borge, M. Cubero, J. P. Fernández-García, A. M. Moro, V. Pesudo, L. Acosta, M. Alcorta, M. A. G. Álvarez, P. C. Bender, L. Buchmann, C. Aa. Diget, A. Di Pietro, D. Escrig, H. Al Falou, П. Фігуера, Benjamin J. Fulton, H. O. U. Fynbo, D. Galaviz, A. B. Garnsworthy, J. Gómez‐Camacho, G. Hackman, R. Kanungo, J. A. Lay, M. Madurga, I. Martel, I. Mukha, T. Nilsson, M. Rodríguez-Gallardo, К. Rusek, Á. M. Sánchez-Benítez, M. M. Rajabali, F. Sarazin, A.C. Shotter, O. Tengblad, C. Unsworth, P. Walden

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Conference on Advances in Radioactive Isotope Science (ARIS2014) · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicNuclear physics research studies
Canadian institutionsSaint Mary's UniversityTRIUMF
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHaloCoulomb barrierScatteringCoulombPhysicsNuclear physicsAtomic physicsAstrophysicsOpticsElectron

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The loosely bound structure of halo nuclei is predicted to a ect the collisions with heavy targets at energies around the Coulomb barrier. We report here on the results on a series of experiments done at different facilities to study the behaviour of the scattering of the archetype of the halo nuclei: 6He, 11Li and 11Be on heavy targets at energies below and around the Coulomb barrier. The results are interpreted in the framework of Continuum-Discretized Coupled-Channel calculations (CDCC). The departure from Rutherford scattering is larger than expected. In first approximation the e ect certainly scales with the loosely bound character of the projectile.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.368
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.004
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.300
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Conference on Advances in Radioactive Isotope Science (ARIS2014)Same topicNuclear physics research studiesFrench-language works237,207