MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335355645 · doi:10.1061/9780784412473.034

Thermal Design of Shallow Building Foundations in Permafrost Regions

2012· article· en· W2335355645 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicHeat Transfer and Numerical Methods
Canadian institutionsTetra Tech (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPermafrostFoundation (evidence)Shallow foundationThermosiphonCivil engineeringThermalPassive coolingEngineeringDuct (anatomy)Geotechnical engineeringGeologyEnvironmental scienceMarine engineeringArchitectural engineeringMechanical engineeringMeteorologyGeographyHeat exchangerOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper describes the general thermal design concept and considerations for the design of a heated, on-grade shallow building foundation on thaw-unstable ground in permafrost regions. Three kinds of foundation cooling systems are discussed. These include the thermosyphon system, ventilated duct system, and heat pump cooling system. Three examples of thermal foundations designs of shallow building foundations in northern Canada and Russia are presented. The major thermal analysis/design findings are summarized for each example.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.831
Threshold uncertainty score0.237

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.307
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2012
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHeat Transfer and Numerical MethodsFrench-language works237,207