MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335389167 · doi:10.21000/jasmr06020187

CONSTRUCTION OF TWO LARGE-SCALE WASTE ROCK PILES IN A CONTINUOUS PERMAFROST REGION

2006· article· en· W2335389167 on OpenAlexafffundabout
David W. Blowes, Michael C. Moncur, Leslie Smith, David C. Sego, John Bennet, Andrew Garvie, C. M. Linklater, Douglas J. Gould, Jeff Reinson

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal American Society of Mining and Reclamation · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicUnderground infrastructure and sustainability
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of British ColumbiaStornoway Diamond (Canada)Natural Resources CanadaUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsPermafrostGeologyScale (ratio)Geotechnical engineeringMining engineeringGeographyCartographyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The discovery of diamonds in Canada's North has led to renewed interest in the development of mining properties in the Arctic. At the Diavik Diamond Mine Inc. operation, open pit mining will lead to the construction of two 200 Mt permanent stockpiles of waste rock. A rigorous, quantitative framework for assessing the long-term environmental implications of storing waste rock in regions with continuous permafrost has yet to be developed. Our study involves the construction of two large-scale waste rock piles (15 m in height 60 m 50 m) to assess the evolution of the hydrology, geochemistry, temperature, and biogeochemistry of the waste rock piles over time. One test pile will contain rock with a sulfide content of < 0.04 wt% S and the other test pile contains rock with > 0.8 wt% S. Complementary studies involving conventional static and kinetic tests on small test samples have also been initiated. The results from this five-year study will assist mining companies and regulators in evaluating current waste rock pile designs. This paper describes the construction of test piles, preliminary modeling of heat transfer and oxygen transport within the piles, and additional testing planned to quantify the relationship between weathering rates in laboratory dissolution tests and those in waste rock piles in the field.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.442
Threshold uncertainty score0.312

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2006
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal American Society of Mining and ReclamationSame topicUnderground infrastructure and sustainabilityFrench-language works237,207