MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335389223 · doi:10.4006/0836-1398-27.2.286

The dynamic steady state universe

2014· article· en· W2335389223 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysics Essays · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicCosmology and Gravitation Theories
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhysicsAetherTheoretical physicsCosmologyGravitationUniverseMathematical physicsAstrophysicsClassical mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is a strange historical omission that no examination of the intrinsically cellular universe model has ever been reported. In an effort to correct this oversight, the current work constructs a surprisingly natural cosmology by combining Hubble’s great discovery, Einstein’s nonponderable aether, Penzias and Wilson’s distant starlight, Heraclitus’s harmony-of-opposites principle, and by incorporating more recent developments including the powerful particle theory of Williamson and a unifying concept of gravitation. With the addition of a two-faceted sine qua non Primary-Cause process and a sui generis mode of aether excitation, the entire construction becomes fully functional. It is clearly shown how the photon is responsible for the cause of 2 Physics Essays Vol.27, No.2 (2014) Reprint gravitation. Avoiding the speculative assumptions and preposterous extrapolations inherent in expanding-universe cosmology, the new interpretation constructs a perfectly natural Dynamic Steady State Universe with integral cellular structure. © 2014 Physics Essays Publication. [http://dx.doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-27.2.286] Resume: L’absence totale d’etudes publiees sur le modele de l’univers intrinsequement cellulaire constitue une omission historique etrange. Dans le but de remedier a ce manquement, la presente etude construit une cosmologie etonnamment naturelle en combinant la grande decouverte de Hubble, l’ether imponderable d’Einstein, la lumiere stellaire distante de Penzias et Wilson, le principe d’harmonie des contraires d’Heraclite, ainsi que des developpements plus recents dont la puissante theorie particulaire de Williamson et un concept unificateur pour la gravitation. Avec l’ajout d’un processus de cause primaire sine qua non a deux facettes et d’un mode sui generis d’excitation de l’ether, la construction dans son ensemble devient entierement fonctionnelle. La maniere dont le photon est a l’origine de la gravitation est clairement montree. Tout en evitant les suppositions speculatives et les extrapolations aberrantes inherentes a la cosmologie de l’univers en expansion, la nouvelle interpretation construit un univers dynamique en regime permanent avec une structure cellulaire integrale.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.847
Threshold uncertainty score0.243

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it