Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is a strange historical omission that no examination of the intrinsically cellular universe model has ever been reported. In an effort to correct this oversight, the current work constructs a surprisingly natural cosmology by combining Hubble’s great discovery, Einstein’s nonponderable aether, Penzias and Wilson’s distant starlight, Heraclitus’s harmony-of-opposites principle, and by incorporating more recent developments including the powerful particle theory of Williamson and a unifying concept of gravitation. With the addition of a two-faceted sine qua non Primary-Cause process and a sui generis mode of aether excitation, the entire construction becomes fully functional. It is clearly shown how the photon is responsible for the cause of 2 Physics Essays Vol.27, No.2 (2014) Reprint gravitation. Avoiding the speculative assumptions and preposterous extrapolations inherent in expanding-universe cosmology, the new interpretation constructs a perfectly natural Dynamic Steady State Universe with integral cellular structure. © 2014 Physics Essays Publication. [http://dx.doi.org/10.4006/0836-1398-27.2.286] Resume: L’absence totale d’etudes publiees sur le modele de l’univers intrinsequement cellulaire constitue une omission historique etrange. Dans le but de remedier a ce manquement, la presente etude construit une cosmologie etonnamment naturelle en combinant la grande decouverte de Hubble, l’ether imponderable d’Einstein, la lumiere stellaire distante de Penzias et Wilson, le principe d’harmonie des contraires d’Heraclite, ainsi que des developpements plus recents dont la puissante theorie particulaire de Williamson et un concept unificateur pour la gravitation. Avec l’ajout d’un processus de cause primaire sine qua non a deux facettes et d’un mode sui generis d’excitation de l’ether, la construction dans son ensemble devient entierement fonctionnelle. La maniere dont le photon est a l’origine de la gravitation est clairement montree. Tout en evitant les suppositions speculatives et les extrapolations aberrantes inherentes a la cosmologie de l’univers en expansion, la nouvelle interpretation construit un univers dynamique en regime permanent avec une structure cellulaire integrale.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".