MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335398026 · doi:10.1049/el.2016.0717

Orthogonal polynomials non‐linearity compensation for a digital VCO‐based ADC

2016· article· en· W2335398026 on OpenAlexaff
Yuke Zhang, Kamal El‐Sankary

Bibliographic record

VenueElectronics Letters · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit Design
Canadian institutionsDalhousie University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVoltage-controlled oscillatorLinearityElectronic engineeringOrthogonal polynomialsCompensation (psychology)Computer scienceMathematicsElectrical engineeringEngineeringVoltagePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

An improved compensation method for an all‐standard‐cell voltage‐controlled oscillator (VCO)‐based ADC is presented in this Letter. The proposed compensation uses closed‐form orthogonal polynomials bases instead of power series ones. With these more powerful bases, the cross interaction between different basis is eliminated which leads to better resolution, lower order of compensation series, and shorter convergence time of the adaptive algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.842
Threshold uncertainty score0.588

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.187 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueElectronics LettersSame topicAnalog and Mixed-Signal Circuit DesignFrench-language works237,207