MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335442430 · doi:10.1021/jm200584g

Assessing Atropisomer Axial Chirality in Drug Discovery and Development

2011· review· en· W2335442430 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medicinal Chemistry · 2011
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAxial and Atropisomeric Chirality Synthesis
Canadian institutionsBoehringer Ingelheim (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeb sitePhoneAtropisomerLibrary scienceChemistryMedicineComputer scienceWorld Wide WebThe InternetStereochemistryPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPerspectiveNEXTAssessing Atropisomer Axial Chirality in Drug Discovery and DevelopmentSteven R. LaPlante*†, Lee D. Fader†, Keith R. Fandrick‡, Daniel R. Fandrick‡, Oliver Hucke†, Ray Kemper‡, Stephen P. F. Miller§, and Paul J. Edwards*†View Author Information† Department of Chemistry, Boehringer Ingelheim (Canada) Ltd., 2100 Cunard Street, Laval, Quebec, H7S 2G5, Canada‡ Chemical Development, Non-Clinical Drug Safety, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceutical Inc., 900 Ridgebury Road, Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877, United States§ Office of New Drug Quality Assessment, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 10903 New Hampshire Avenue, Building 22, Room 1446, Silver Spring, Maryland 20993, United States*For S.R.L.: phone, 1-450-682-4640; fax, 1-450-682-8434; e-mail, [email protected]. For P.J.E.: phone, 1-450-682-4640; e-mail, [email protected]Cite this: J. Med. Chem. 2011, 54, 20, 7005–7022Publication Date (Web):August 17, 2011Publication History Received10 May 2011Published online15 September 2011Published inissue 27 October 2011https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/jm200584ghttps://doi.org/10.1021/jm200584greview-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2011 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views17317Altmetric-Citations577LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Chirality,Drug discovery,Mixtures,Molecular structure,Pharmaceuticals Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.962
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.061
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.261 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it