MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335476150

Working with Adolescents who have a Chronic Disease: Information for Educators and Counsellors

2015· article· en· W2335476150 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAntistasis · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicAdolescent and Pediatric Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLife expectancyChronic diseaseMeaning (existential)Maslow's hierarchy of needsDiseasePsychologyCareer developmentAdult developmentMedicinePopulationGerontologyDevelopmental psychologyMedical educationFamily medicinePsychotherapistPathology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Adolescence is an important developmental period during which individuals typically gain life experiences and make a number of major decisions that will influence their subsequent career development (Young et al., 2011). However, research evidence suggests that career development does not progress in a typical way for adolescents with a chronic disease (Isralsky, Goldberg, & Shwachman, 1979; Maslow, Haydon, McRee, Ford, & Halpern, 2011). Medical advances in diagnosis and treatment have increased the length of survival among those living with a chronic disease, meaning that these individuals now have a life expectancy that will allow them to pursue longer-term career paths. In light of this situation, it is useful for counsellors and educators to become informed about the characteristics and career development needs of adolescents with a chronic disease, and how to work with this population.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.637
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.396
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it