MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335517796 · doi:10.1097/ncm.0b013e3181a7791e

From Ethics Violation to Remediation

2009· article· en· W2335517796 on OpenAlexaff
Linda Chalmers

Bibliographic record

VenueProfessional Case Management · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicEthics in medical practice
Canadian institutions123 Certification (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCertificationAccreditationCommissionCorporationCase managerCase managementBusinessManagementEngineering managementPolitical scienceProcess managementEngineeringLawFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Linda Chalmers, BSN, RN, CCM, WCLA, is former Commissioner and past Chair of the Commission for Case Manager Certification, which is the first and largest nationally accredited organization that certifies case managers. She has been a field case manager for many years, and is currently a telephonic case manager for Zurich Services Corporation. Address correspondence to Linda Chalmers, BSN, RN, CCM, WCLA, Commission for Case Manager Certification.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.022
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.109
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Commentary · Consensus signal: Commentary
Teacher disagreement score0.022
Threshold uncertainty score0.114

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0220.109
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0090.035
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0020.013
Research integrity0.0100.022
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.152
GPT teacher head0.547
Teacher spread0.395 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreCommentary

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProfessional Case ManagementSame topicEthics in medical practiceFrench-language works237,207