MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335563122 · doi:10.1109/tsg.2016.2533164

Estimating Power Generation of Invisible Solar Sites Using Publicly Available Data

2016· article· en· W2335563122 on OpenAlexaff
Hamid Reza Shaker, Hamidreza Zareipour, David Wood

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Smart Grid · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicSolar Radiation and Photovoltaics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhotovoltaic systemSolar powerElectricity generationElectric power systemPower (physics)Computer scienceScale (ratio)EngineeringReliability engineeringElectrical engineeringGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Large-scale integration of invisible solar photovoltaic generation into power systems could significantly affect the system net load and pose new challenges in the operation of power systems. Invisible solar photovoltaic refers mainly to small-scale roof-top solar sites that are not monitored, and thus are invisible to utilities and system operators. Invisible solar generation affects the shape of system net electrical load and could make net load forecasting more challenging. In this paper, a methodology is proposed to estimate the power generation of invisible solar photovoltaic sites. The proposed method only uses the measured power generation data of publicly available sites. It uses real time data of a small subset of sites to estimate the aggregated power generation from known sites within a region. The proposed model is validated using actual invisible solar generation data of the California power system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.033

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.123
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.167 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations107
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Smart GridSame topicSolar Radiation and PhotovoltaicsFrench-language works237,207