MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335636844 · doi:10.18647/2843/jjs-2009

The Variant Textual Readings in the Hebrew University Isaiah Scroll (1QIsa <sup>b</sup> )

2009· article· en· W2335636844 on OpenAlex
Peter W. Flint, Eugene Ulrich

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Jewish Studies · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical and Linguistic Studies
Canadian institutionsTrinity Western UniversityWestern University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsScrollHebrewHebrew BibleLiteratureHistoryPhilosophyArtLinguisticsTheologyBiblical studies

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article presents all the textual variants in the smaller Isaiah Scroll from Cave One (1Q8 or 1QIsa b ), also known as the ‘Hebrew University Isaiah Scroll’, which preserves material ranging from Isa. 7:20 to 66:24. With respect to textual character, 1QIsa b has been classified as proto-Masoretic in view of its general affinity with the received Masoretic Text. For the forthcoming edition of 1QIsa b (vol. 32 in the series ‘Discoveries in the Judaean Desert’), a variant reading is determined wherever 1QIsa b differs from another Hebrew witness (Qumran scrolls, such as 1QIsa a , the MT as in the Leningrad Codex, or other Masoretic manuscripts and editions). In a few cases, the collation is against the Septuagint, but difference from the Greek is not a fixed criterion for determining a variant reading.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.854
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.301
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it