MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335716688 · doi:10.1021/cm403740r

Bimodal Mesoporous Carbon Nanofibers with High Porosity: Freestanding and Embedded in Membranes for Lithium–Sulfur Batteries

2014· article· en· W2335716688 on OpenAlexafffund
Guang He, Benjamin Mandlmeier, Jörg Schuster, Linda F. Nazar, Thomas Bein

Bibliographic record

VenueChemistry of Materials · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Battery Materials and Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNational Institute for Materials ScienceCanada Research Chairs
KeywordsMaterials sciencePorosityMesoporous materialNanofiberElectrochemistryMembraneChemical engineeringSulfurCathodeCarbon nanofiberAnodeCarbon fibersLithium (medication)Specific surface areaElectrodeNanotechnologyComposite materialChemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryCarbon nanotubeComposite numberMetallurgy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We demonstrate a synthetic approach for highly ordered hexagonal mesoporous carbon nanofibers with bimodal porosity, with an extremely high surface area and a high inner pore volume of 1928 m 2 /g and 2.41 cm 3 /g, respectively. A tubular silica template acts as an alternative fiber template for anodic alumina membranes. The sulfur cathode fabricated with the nanofibers shows much better electrochemical performance compared with our previously reported BMC-1/S cathodes by achieving a more homogeneous sulfur distribution in the carbon nanofiber framework. It is also noted that the variation of porous architectures of the carbon framework (i.e., low volumetric ratio of small mesopores over the total pore volume) results in very different electrochemistry, suggesting the significance of porosity optimization for sulfur electrodes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.740

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.184
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations84
Published2014
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChemistry of MaterialsSame topicAdvanced Battery Materials and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207