MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335738069 · doi:10.1115/imece2004-59341

Membraneless Liquid-Fuel Microfluidic Fuel Cells: A Computational Study

2004· article· en· W2335738069 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueFluids Engineering · 2004
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Victoria
FundersUniversity of British Columbia
KeywordsMicrofluidicsComputational fluid dynamicsLaminar flowMaterials scienceLiquid fuelMechanicsProton exchange membrane fuel cellAspect ratio (aeronautics)TurbulenceChemistryFuel cellsNanotechnologyOptoelectronicsChemical engineeringEngineeringPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Presented in this paper is a computational analysis of a membraneless microfluidic fuel cell that uses the laminar nature of microflows to maintain the separation of fuel and oxidant streams. The fuel cell consists of a T-shaped microfluidic channel with liquid fuel and oxidant entering at separate inlets and flowing in parallel without turbulent or convective mixing. Electrodes are placed along the walls, and the resulting redox reactions provide the cell voltage and current. A concise electrochemical model of the key reactions and appropriate boundary conditions for the computational fluid dynamic (CFD) modelling of this system are developed and implemented into the numerical model. The coupled flow, species transport and chemical aspects of the microfluidic fuel cell are simulated. The effects of geometry and flow rates on fuel cell performance are investigated. Results indicate that the microfluidic fuel cell performance is limited by the transport of reactants through the concentration boundary layer to the electrodes. Three typical geometries were simulated, and it was found that increasing the aspect ratio of the channel cross-section from a square geometry to a rectangular one leads to more than a two-fold increase in fuel utilization. The two rectangular geometries simulated consist of a design with a high aspect ratio in the direction perpendicular to the plane of cross-stream diffusion as well as a design with a high aspect ratio in the direction parallel to the plane of cross-stream diffusion. The electrode placement and geometry play key roles with respect to mixing and fuel utilization. The design with a high aspect ratio in the direction perpendicular to the plane of cross-stream diffusion demonstrated relatively less cross-stream mixing compared to the other rectangular geometry, and had the potential for improved fuel utilization with appropriate electrode design. In addition, results suggest that fuel utilization can be increased from previous values by a factor of two or more. Decreasing the inlet velocity from 0.1 m/s to 0.02 m/s caused the fuel utilization to increase non-linearly from 8 % to 23 %, and only caused an increase of 3 % in cross-stream mixing at the outlet.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.475
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.188
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it