MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335781477

Canada’s Reluctant Housing Program: The Veterans’ Land Act, 1942–75

2016· article· en· W2335781477 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Richard Harris, Tricia Shulist

Bibliographic record

VenueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University) · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCanadian Identity and History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGovernment (linguistics)Settlement (finance)Element (criminal law)De factoPolitical sciencePublic administrationHumanitiesLawBusinessArtFinance
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The Veterans’ Land Act was a major element in the package of programs designed for Canadian veterans after the Second World War. It was primarily intended to promote farm settlement, although a provision for small holdings was supposed to enable urban workers to enjoy the benefits of rural living. To this end, from the late 1940s, they were given assistance in building their own homes. In fact, the small holdings proved the most popular aspect of the Land Act, making it into a de facto urban housing program. Thousands of urban veterans recognized that this provision could help them obtain homes at the suburban fringe. Together with veterans’ organizations and elected representatives, they lobbied the government to adapt small holdings to better suit their needs, chiefly by reducing the minimum lot size requirement below 2 acres. They met with some success. Although the anti-urban sentiment of policy makers limited its impact, the small holdings scheme was the most popular and effective of all government housing programs in the early postwar decades. Abstract: La Loi sur les terres destinees aux anciens combattants a ete un element majeur de ľensemble des programmes concus pour les anciens combattants canadiens apres la Deuxieme Guerre mondiale. Cette loi avait pour but de favoriser ľetablissement de fermes, bien qưune disposition visant les petits lopins de terre dut permettre aux travailleurs de la ville de profiter des avantages de la vie a la campagne. Dans ce but, a partir de la fin des annees 1940, ils recurent de ľaide pour construire leurs propres maisons. En realite, la disposition concernant les petits lopins se revela etre le volet le plus populaire de la Loi sur les terres, en en faisant de fait un programme ďhabitation urbaine. Des milliers ďanciens combattants reconnurent que cette disposition pourrait les aider a obtenir une maison en peripherie de la ville. De concert avec les organisations ďanciens combattants et leurs representants elus, ils firent pression aupres du gouvernement pour modifier le morcellement des terres, afin qưil reponde mieux a leurs besoins, surtout en reduisant a moins de deux acres la superficie minimum exigee pour le terrain. Ils y reussirent en partie. Bien que le sentiment anti-urbain des responsables des politiques en limitât les retombees, le plan des petits lopins fut le plus populaire et le plus efficace de tous les programmes de logement gouvernementaux dans les premieres decennies de ľapres-guerre.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesScience and technology studies
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.941
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0040.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProject Muse (Johns Hopkins University)Same topicCanadian Identity and HistoryFrench-language works237,207