MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335818655 · doi:10.22374/cjgim.v8i0.105

Clinical Update on Spondyloarthritis

2013· article· en· W2335818655 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Isabelle Fortin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of General Internal Medicine · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicSpondyloarthritis Studies and Treatments
Canadian institutionsRoyal College of Physicians and Surgeons of CanadaCentre Intégré de Santé et Services Sociaux de la GaspésieCégep de RimouskiUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineAnkylosing spondylitisEnthesitisPsoriasisSacroiliitisInflammatory bowel diseaseHLA-B27Rheumatoid arthritisDermatologySpondylitisUveitisReactive arthritisDiseaseMagnetic resonance imagingPsoriatic arthritisRadiologyPathologyInternal medicineImmunologyHuman leukocyte antigenAntigen

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The spondyloarthritides encompass various clinical manifestations. The hallmark of the spondylo-arthropathies is inflammatory axial and sacroiliac (buttock) pain. Associated findings include peripheral arthritis, uveitis, conjunctivitis, enthesitis, and psoriasis. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) B27 is positive in a majority of patients. Radiographic abnormalities appear first on vertebral column/sacroiliac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and many years later on radiography, which makes the diagnosis challenging. Of course, rheumatoid factor is negative – hence the term seronegative arthritis. Other clinical clues that help identify this disease’s spectrum are a family history of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriasis, or inflammatory bowel disease (IBD); intestinal or genitourinary symptoms; or the presence of psoriasis. All this heterogeneity makes an early diagnosis difficult.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.025
Threshold uncertainty score0.084

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0250.014

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2013
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of General Internal MedicineSame topicSpondyloarthritis Studies and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207