MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335884387

Parallel Particle Swarm Optimization on Graphical Processing Unit for Pose Estimation

2012· article· en· W2335884387 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsRoyal Military College of Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpeedupCUDAComputer scienceParallel computingParticle swarm optimizationComputationCentral processing unitGraphics processing unitParallel processingGeneral-purpose computing on graphics processing unitsAlgorithmParallel algorithmGraphicsComputer graphics (images)Computer hardware
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this paper, we present a parallel implementation of the Particle Swarm Optimization (PSO) on GPU using CUDA. By fully utilizing the processing power of graphic processors, our implementation provides a speedup of 215x compared to a sequential implementation on CPU. This speedup is significantly superior to what has been reported in recent papers and is achieved by a few simple optimizations we made to better adapt the parallel algorithm to the specific architecture of the NVIDIA GPU. Next, we apply our parallel PSO to the problem of 3D pose estimation of a bomb in free fall. We reduce the computation time of the analysis of 120 images to about 1 s, representing a speedup of 140x compared to the sequential version on CPU.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.336
Threshold uncertainty score0.336

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.047
GPT teacher head0.306
Teacher spread0.260 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations19
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207