MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335938893

Bernoulli Effects on Pressure-Activated Water Level Gauges

2015· article· en· W2335938893 on OpenAlexaff
Langley R. Muir

Bibliographic record

VenueThe International Hydrographic Review · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Canadian institutionsFisheries and Oceans Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBernoulli's principleWater levelInstrumentation (computer programming)Hydrostatic equilibriumGauge (firearms)Hydrostatic pressurePressure measurementEnvironmental scienceMechanicsEngineeringMarine engineeringPhysicsMechanical engineeringMaterials scienceComputer scienceGeographyAerospace engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

New developments in instrumentation engineering have led to the introduction of pressure-activated, submerged water level gauges such as the Aanderaa. These gauges may be placed in locations in which the velocity in the water column above the- gauge and the variations in density cannot be neglected. We show that significant errors can arise if the traditional hydrostatic assumption is made. The correct formulae are given for the conversion of pressure to water level, and the limits of applicability of these formulae are discussed. Recommendations are given for the elimination of Bernoulli effects from water level records.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.010

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.009
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.053
GPT teacher head0.302
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe International Hydrographic ReviewSame topicReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsFrench-language works237,207