MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2335975527 · doi:10.1504/ijspacese.2015.075911

Classification of cloud scenes by Argus spectral data

2015· article· en· W2335975527 on OpenAlex
Rehan Siddiqui, Rajinder K. Jagpal, N Salem, Brendan M. Quine

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Space Science and Engineering · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicCalibration and Measurement Techniques
Canadian institutionsYork University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsArgusRemote sensingRadianceRadiative transferShortwaveAtmospheric radiative transfer codesCloud computingSatelliteComputer scienceEnvironmental scienceMeteorologyPhysicsGeologyOpticsAstronomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The mini-spectrometer Argus 1000 being in space, continuously monitors the sources and sinks of the trace gases. This paper presents a methodology of classification of cloud scene by Argus Spectral Data (CCSArSD) by applying radiance enhancement (RE) technique within 900-1700 nm of wavelength bands at infrared sounder along with GENSPECT line by line radiative transfer code for different weeks per passes. Argus was launched on aboard CanX-2 micro-satellite on 28th April 2008 as part of a technology demonstration mission. The algorithm describes a method to detect the cloudy or non-cloudy scenes. We have collected more than 300 weeks per passes with each have more than 200 spectra. The REi within the selected wavelength bands of Argus, provides a promising results to classify the cloud scene. We moreover worked on the shortwave upwelling radiative flux (W/m2) to improve the CCSArSD model, which needs further study to jump up to higher rank.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.506
Threshold uncertainty score0.190

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.227 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it