MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336019627

Basis Function Discovery using Spectral Clustering and Bisimulation Metrics (Extended Abstract)

2011· article· en· W2336019627 on OpenAlexaff
Gheorghe Comanici, Doina Precup

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicBayesian Modeling and Causal Inference
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceMarkov decision processBellman equationSet (abstract data type)Function (biology)Feature (linguistics)Cluster analysisFocus (optics)State spaceArtificial intelligenceNotationFeature vectorMathematical optimizationMarkov processMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) are a powerful framework for modeling sequential decision making for intelligent agents acting in stochastic environments. One of the important challenges facing such agents in practical applications is finding a suitable way to represent the state space, so that a good way of behaving can be learned efficiently. In this paper, we focus on learning a good policy when function approximation must be used to represent the value function. In this case, states are mapped into feature vectors, and a set of parameters is learned, which allows us to approximate the value of any given state. Theoretically, the quality of the approximation that can be obtained depends on the set of features. In practice, the feature set affects not only the quality of the solution obtained, but also the speed of learning. We focus on learning feature vectors in fully specified MDPs by a set of states S, a set of actions A, a transition model P : S × A × S → [0, 1], and a reward function R : S × A → [0, 1]. Also, γ is a discount factor and γ ∈ (0, 1). A policy π : S × A → [0, 1] specifies a way of behaving for the agent, and we would like to evaluate the long term behavior it generates. We do this using the value function, which is defined (using matrix notation) as V = ∑∞ i=0(γπP ) (πR) = π(R + γPV ). The last equality is known as the Bellman equation, and is at the heart of most incremental sampling algorithms to find V . Our goal is to linearly approximate intermediate computations Cite as: Basis Function Discovery using Spectral Clustering and Bisimulation Metrics (Extended Abstract), Gheorghe Comanici, Doina Precup, Proc. of 10th Int. Conf. on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2011), Tumer, Yolum, Sonenberg and Stone (eds.), May, 2–6, 2011, Taipei, Taiwan, pp. 1079-1080. Copyright c © 2011, International Foundation for Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (www.ifaamas.org). All rights reserved. of V ≈ Φθ, where Φ maps every state to feature vectors of dimension much smaller than |S|, and attempt to minimize ||V − Φθ||2. Two types of methods have been proposed in recent years to tackle this problem. The first category of methods aims to construct basis functions that reduce the error in value function estimation[3, 5]. In this case, features are rewardoriented, and are formed with the goal of reducing value function estimation errors. The second approach, exemplified by the work of Mahadevan and Maggioni [4] (and their colleagues) relies on using data to construct a state connectivity graph. Spectral clustering methods are then used to construct state features. The resulting features capture interesting transition properties of the environment (e.g. different spatial resolution) and are reward-independent. That is, the features generated are eigenvectors of the Normal-

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.009
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.270
Teacher spread0.180 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicBayesian Modeling and Causal InferenceFrench-language works237,207