MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336064557 · doi:10.15358/0340-1650-2016-4-214

Ein Beispiel einer Blended-Learning-Veranstaltung

2016· article· de· W2336064557 on OpenAlexaff
Andreas Löffler

Bibliographic record

VenueWiSt - Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches Studium · 2016
Typearticle
Languagede
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation Methods and Technologies
Canadian institutionsMitel (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPsychologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Seit mehreren Jahren wird eine Massenveranstaltung des 2. Semesters (Bachelor BWL bzw VWL) an der Freien Universität mit den Mitteln des Blended-Learning angeboten.In meinem Vortrag berichte ich von den technischen Voraussetzungen, den pädagogischen Herausforderungen und der studentischen Rezeption dieser Veranstaltung.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.027
Threshold uncertainty score0.091

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0020.005
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0270.016

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.325
Teacher spread0.298 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueWiSt - Wirtschaftswissenschaftliches StudiumSame topicEducation Methods and TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207