MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336064795 · doi:10.1002/qua.25081

Alternative Ornstein–Zernike models from the homogeneous electron liquid for density functional theory calculations

2016· article· en· W2336064795 on OpenAlexafffund
Rogelio Cuevas‐Saavedra, David C. Thompson, Paul W. Ayers

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Quantum Chemistry · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Chemical Physics Studies
Canadian institutionsMcMaster UniversityWestern University
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsZernike polynomialsParameterized complexityOrnstein–Zernike equationHomogeneousWork (physics)Statistical physicsPhysicsElectronFunction (biology)Correlation function (quantum field theory)MathematicsQuantum mechanicsMathematical analysisAlgorithmIntegral equation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Alternatives to the Ornstein–Zernike direct correlation function (DCF) are proposed, parameterized to reproduce the homogeneous electron liquid, and applied to atomic and molecular systems. This generalizes the work of Amovilli and March [ Phys. Rev. B 76 , 195104 (2007)], where the ordinary Ornstein–Zernike DCF was used. Unlike the Ornstein–Zernike DCF, one of the alternative DCFs explored in this present work produces normalized exchange‐correlation holes. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.485
Threshold uncertainty score0.401

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.268
Teacher spread0.249 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Quantum ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesFrench-language works237,207