MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336075943

Determination of the Monoclinic Properties of Human Tooth Enamel Microstructure by a Periodic Three Dimensional Finite Element Model

2012· dissertation· en· W2336075943 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Cunyou Lu

Bibliographic record

VenueSUNY Digital Repository Support (State University of New York System) · 2012
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldDentistry
TopicDental Erosion and Treatment
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersYork University
KeywordsEnamel paintFinite element methodMicrostructureMonoclinic crystal systemElement (criminal law)Materials scienceMathematicsMathematical analysisGeometryCrystallographyComposite materialStructural engineeringChemistryEngineeringCrystal structure
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Researchers have reported diverse mechanical properties (Young's modulus) of human tooth enamel from experiments and finite element simulations, because of the complicated microstructure, which contains variations in crystal orientations and non-homogeneous properties. Although past models have effectively considered the microstructural effects, appropriate conditions for introducing crystal orientations within enamel rods and the property variations between rods and the interrod enamel are still necessary.In this thesis, the micromechanical response of the enamel microstructure is investigated using a periodic finite element model to determine the effective monoclinic mechanical properties and determine localized effects of microstructure on the stress field. A spherical micro-indentation test was conducted on the bulk enamel model and the effective homogeneous model. The difference in response to indentation loading between the heterogeneous and homogeneous models revealed changes related to the enamel microstructure.The model can be used to consider changes in effective properties of enamel based on microstructural variations, which can be applied to restorative materials attached or embedded within enamel. The study of the influence of microstructure on the damage generation and failure modes of enamel can also be accomplished using the model, which may be due to fractures and the abrasion-erosion wear process.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSUNY Digital Repository Support (State University of New York System)Same topicDental Erosion and TreatmentFrench-language works237,207