MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336236170 · doi:10.1177/0263092316644134

Effect of plate’s parameters on vibration of isotropic tapered rectangular plate with different boundary conditions

2016· article· en· W2336236170 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of low frequency noise, vibration and active control · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsNorthern College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIsotropyTaperingVibrationBoundary value problemPlate theoryBending of platesMathematicsRayleigh–Ritz methodBoundary (topology)GeometryFundamental frequencyMathematical analysisMaterials sciencePhysicsAcousticsOpticsComposite materialBending

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A mathematical model is presented to analyse the vibration of a tapered isotropic rectangular plate under thermal condition. Tapering in the thickness of rectangular plate is considered bi-parabolic. Here, temperature variation is assumed bi-linearly, i.e. temperature varies linearly in the x-direction and linearly in the y-direction. First two modes of frequency of rectangular plate are calculated for five boundary conditions such as C-C-C-C, SS-SS-SS-SS, C-SS-SS-SS, C-SS-C-SS and C-C-C-SS, where C and SS stand for clamped boundary and simply supported boundary, respectively. The plate is considered homogeneous and made up of a visco-elastic isotropic material. Rayleigh Ritz technique is applied to get the first two modes of frequencies at different values of plate’s parameters. Numeric results are presented in tabulated and graphical forms.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.120
Threshold uncertainty score0.380

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.003
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it