Convergence et divergence sociolinguistique en français laurentien: l'alternance rien que/juste/seulement/seulement que/ne. . . que
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ La présente étude est une analyse sociolinguistique de la notion de restriction exprimée par l'alternance rien que / juste / seulement / seulement que / ne . . . que dans le français parlé à Welland (Ontario), Saint-Boniface et Saint-Laurent (Manitoba) et Bonnyville (Alberta). Trois de ces communautés résultent de l'immigration francophone hors Québec, l'autre de l'appropriation du français par les Métis au 18 e siècle. L'examen de l'influence des contraintes internes et externes qui pèsent sur l'emploi des variantes mentionnées ci-dessus met au jour les nombreux points communs qui unissent ces quatre variétés de français mais aussi quelques points de divergence. Ce faisant, notre étude dégage plusieurs pistes de recherche pour une étude panlectale de la convergence et de la divergence sociolinguistique au sein de la famille des variétés de français laurentiens.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".