MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336370945 · doi:10.18162/ritpu-2015-v12n12-03

Analyse statistique des profils et de l’activité des participants d’un MOOC

2015· article· fr· W2336370945 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Avner Bar‐Hen, Hubert Javaux, Nathalie Vialaneix

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicOnline Learning and Analytics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'acronyme MOOC (Massive Online Open Course) est utilisé pour désigner les plateformes d'enseignement en ligne qui proposent des cours ouverts et qui peuvent s'adresser à des centaines, des milliers, voire des dizaines de milliers d'étudiants simultanément.Le but du présent article n'est pas de proposer une analyse du phénomène MOOC dans sa généralité, mais d'offrir une vision originale d'un MOOC, au travers de ses étudiants, de leur profil et de leur activité lors du cours.Pour ce faire, nous analysons les données collectées lors d'un des premiers cours lancés sur la plateforme française FUN, le cours « Fondamentaux en statistique ».Nous y décrivons la communauté des étudiants, leur profil socioéconomique, leurs motivations, leur activité sur le forum du cours.Nous étudierons comment les échanges sur le forum se structurent lors du cours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.039
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.038

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.039
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaireSame topicOnline Learning and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207