MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336370945 · doi:10.18162/ritpu-2015-v12n12-03

Analyse statistique des profils et de l’activité des participants d’un MOOC

2015· article· fr· W2336370945 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Avner Bar‐Hen, Hubert Javaux, Nathalie Vialaneix

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaire · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicOnline Learning and Analytics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L'acronyme MOOC (Massive Online Open Course) est utilis pour dsigner les plateformes d'enseignement en ligne qui proposent des cours ouverts et qui peuvent s'adresser des centaines, des milliers, voire des dizaines de milliers d'tudiants simultanment. Le but du prsent article n'est pas de proposer une analyse du phnomne MOOC dans sa gnralit, mais d'offrir une vision originale d'un MOOC, au travers de ses tudiants, de leur profil et de leur activit lors du cours. Pour ce faire, nous analysons les donnes collectes lors d'un des premiers cours lancs sur la plateforme franaise FUN, le cours Fondamentaux en statistique . Nous y dcrivons la communaut des tudiants, leur profil socioconomique, leurs motivations, leur activit sur le forum du cours. Nous tudierons comment les changes sur le forum se structurent lors du cours.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.693
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.102
GPT teacher head0.342
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevue internationale des technologies en pédagogie universitaireSame topicOnline Learning and AnalyticsFrench-language works237,207