MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336429597 · doi:10.5007/2175-8026.2010n58p157

"A Sceptic in a Credulous World": re-evaluating the work of Stewart Parker on the twentieth anniversary of his death

2010· article· en· W2336429597 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Clare Wallace

Bibliographic record

VenueAmericanae (AECID Library) · 2010
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicIrish and British Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSkepticismWork (physics)Art historyArtPhilosophyEngineeringEpistemologyMechanical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to survey and re-evaluate the work of Northern Irish writer, Stewart Parker, following the twentieth anniversary of his death in November 2008. The paper takes into account work collected and published in 2008 that had been previously available only in archives. The focus is upon the alternative images of Northern Ireland that are to be found in Parker's dramatic writings. These alternative versions might be informally divided into two categories: the work that deals with specific historical events or moments, and the work which more generally addresses conditions of existence in and attitudes to Northern Ireland. In both what is of most consequence is personal experience and individual will to transcend or survive the constraints of circumstance. It is this quality which has led commentators to remark upon the humanistic and humane tenor of Parker's work and remains as captivating today as it did more than twenty years ago. The plays discussed include Spokesong, Northern Star, Pentecost, The Iceberg, I'm a Dreamer Montreal, Iris in the Traffic, Ruby in the Rain and Lost Belongings.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.103
Threshold uncertainty score0.204

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0170.032
Scholarly communication0.0130.006
Open science0.0030.009
Research integrity0.0020.007
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.304
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2010
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAmericanae (AECID Library)Same topicIrish and British StudiesFrench-language works237,207