MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336476267 · doi:10.7202/1035435ar

Enjeux de santé des aînés francophones vivant en situation minoritaire : une analyse différenciée selon les sexes1

2016· article· fr· W2336476267 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Solange van Kemenade, Louise Bouchard, Christian Bergeron

Bibliographic record

VenueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaire · 2016
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldHealth Professions
TopicInterpreting and Communication in Healthcare
Canadian institutionsUniversité de MontréalMontfort HospitalUniversité du Québec en Outaouais
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceSociologyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

La recherche en santé sur les Communautés de langue officielle vivant en situation minoritaire révèle des disparités. Le fait d’être minoritaire dans une société, conjointement avec d’autres déterminants, comme le statut socioéconomique, l’éducation en santé, et le fait de ne pas avoir un soutien social contribuent aux disparités de santé. Dans le contexte du vieillissement plus marqué des populations de langue officielle vivant en situation minoritaire, nous avons examiné la situation des aînés francophones. Pour cela, une analyse secondaire des données issues de l’Enquête sur la santé des collectivités canadiennes (ESCC) a été réalisée. Nous présentons dans cet article, une analyse différenciée de leur situation sociosanitaire selon le sexe et le genre en dressant le portrait des états de santé, des incapacités et des besoins sur le plan des soins de santé.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesResearch integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.789
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0040.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.060
GPT teacher head0.433
Teacher spread0.373 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2016
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReflets Revue d’intervention sociale et communautaireSame topicInterpreting and Communication in HealthcareFrench-language works237,207