Etude Preliminaire Entre L’Attachement Amoureux et la Dramatisation Face a la Douleur chez des Individus Vivant Avec de la Douleur Chronique
Bibliographic record
Abstract
L’objectif de cette étude préliminaire est d’examiner la perception du soutien offert par le partenaire amoureux comme médiateur de la relation entre l’attachement amoureux du patient (anxiété face à l’abandon et évitement de l’intimité) et la dramatisation de la douleur par ce dernier, de même que les liens directs entre ces variables. L’échantillon d'analyse comprend 46 adultes qui vivent quotidiennement avec de la douleur chronique et qui sont en relation de couple depuis au moins 6 mois. Les participants ont complété l’Experiences in Close Relationships, le Perceived Responsiveness Scale et le Pain Catastrophizing Scale. Les résultats indiquent que plus un individu a un attachement non sécurisant, moins il perçoit de soutien de son partenaire amoureux. L’anxiété face à l’abandon est associée à plus de dramatisation face à la douleur.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".