MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Navy Bean Supplementation in Obesity Increases <i>Akkermansia muciniphila</i> Abundance and Attenuates Obesity Related Impairments in Gut Barrier Function

2016· article· en· W2336520983 on OpenAlexaff
Jennifer M. Monk, Dion Lepp, Wenqing Wu, Daniela Gräf, Amber L. Hutchinson, Lindsay E. Robinson, Krista A. Power

Bibliographic record

VenueThe FASEB Journal · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicGut microbiota and health
Canadian institutionsUniversity of GuelphAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAkkermansia muciniphilaGut floraBarrier functionBiologyEndocrinologyAkkermansiaObesityInternal medicineFecesMicrobiologyFood scienceImmunologyMedicineLactobacillusCell biology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fiber‐rich dietary pulses, such as common beans ( Phaseolus vulgaris ) have the potential to modify the colonic microenvironment (microbiota and host epithelial barrier) which can mitigate the severity of gut‐associated pathologies. Obesity is associated with impairments in the mucosal barrier (leaky gut) and specific changes in the abundance of bacteria communities within the gut microbiota. The objective was to assess the gut health promoting effects of 20% cooked navy bean flour supplementation in both the lean healthy and obese states. Two studies were conducted wherein male C57BL/6 mice were fed either a low fat control (LF, 10% fat as kcal) or an isocaloric bean supplemented diet (LF+B) for 3 weeks ( Study 1: lean healthy ), or a high fat diet (HF, 60% fat as kcal) or isocaloric bean supplemented (HF+B) diet for 12 weeks ( Study 2: diet induced obesity ). In lean mice, using fecal 16S rRNA sequencing, LF+B altered the abundance of critical gut microbial families including increased abundance of S24–7 (1.5‐fold) and Prevotellaceae (71‐fold) and decreased abundance of Peptococcaceae (3.7‐fold), Streptococcaceae (8.4‐fold), Clostridiaceae (12‐fold), Rikenellaceae (2.5‐fold) and Porphyromonadaceae (2.5‐fold) versus LF. These changes were associated with increased microbial activity (i.e, short chain fatty acid (SCFA) production) and colonic tissue expression of the SCFA receptors GPR41 , 43 and 109a . LF+B improved gut barrier integrity and function by increasing i) mucus production, ii) anti‐microbial defenses, iii) tight junction protein expression, and iv) reducing serum lipopolysaccharide levels. These beneficial effects were sustained in obesity wherein HF+B fed mice exhibited improvements in both gut microbiota activity and community structure and aspects of the obese phenotype. Specifically, fecal abundance of Akkermansia muciniphila , whose abundance is inversely related to the severity of the obese phenotype, was increased in the HF+B group versus HF by 20‐fold, which was associated with a reduction in visceral adipose mRNA expression of the inflammatory mediators MCP‐1 and IL‐6 and increased expression of adiponectin . Colon epithelial barrier integrity was improved in the HF+B group versus HF, as evidenced by increased mRNA expression of tight junction components ( ZO‐1, occludin, JAM‐A and claudin‐2 ) and functionally by reduced serum FITC‐dextran concentration in an in vivo gut permeability test. Additionally, evidence of an enhanced mucus barrier and anti‐microbial defence was apparent in the HF+B group versus HF based on increased goblet cell number and upregulated expression of Muc1‐3 and Reg3 γ, respectively. In conclusion, bean supplementation enhanced gut barrier integrity and exerted a beneficial colon‐function priming effect that helps mitigate the severity of the obese phenotype. Support or Funding Information ORF, AAFC Pulse‐Cluster

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.231 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe FASEB JournalSame topicGut microbiota and healthFrench-language works237,207