MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336521428 · doi:10.1089/ees.2015.0395

Impact of Resin and Fatty Acids on Full-Scale Anaerobic Treatment of Pulp and Paper Mill Effluents

2016· article· en· W2336521428 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueEnvironmental Engineering Science · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWastewater Treatment and Nitrogen Removal
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaGovernment of CanadaOntario GenomicsOntario Genomics InstituteGenome Canada
KeywordsEffluentPulp and paper industryClarifierChemical oxygen demandChemistryPulp (tooth)WastewaterAnaerobic digestionBiogasPaper millSequencing batch reactorPulp millChromatographyWaste managementMethaneOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Wastewater generated during pulp and paper production usually contains large amounts of organic matter that may be converted to biogas through anaerobic treatment. These effluents can also contain a variety of inhibitors such as resin acids and long-chain fatty acids (RFAs) among other compounds. A multivariate data analysis was conducted with performance and water quality data from an anaerobic reactor at a pulp and paper mill, which provides unprecedented evidence for the long-term inhibitory effects of RFAs during full-scale operation. Although RFAs in the reactor influent did not cause serious process disturbance, they significantly contributed to the variability in the percentage removal of soluble chemical oxygen demand (percent sCOD removal) (∼45% to ∼75%), as well as the variability in volatile fatty acid concentration in the effluent (2 to >20 meq/L). Furthermore, a linear correlation was found between RFA concentrations in the reactor sludge bed and the percent sCOD removal. An effective strategy to remove RFAs before anaerobic treatment is upfront removal of particles within the primary clarifier. Based on an exploratory model, a graphical method is introduced that allows for quick assessment of the extent to which resin acids are sorbed to particles, and associated potential for upfront settling. When the pH of high-solids wastewater is below 7, the majority of resin acids will be associated with particles and a considerable fraction of these can therefore be removed by means of settling or floatation. Finally, a novel liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry method that rapidly quantifies major RFA constituents was developed. In the full-scale reactor, dehydroabietic acid (DHA) represented the bulk (∼92%) of the resin acids within the granular sludge. DHA in sludge warrants special attention and should be monitored closely.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.528
Threshold uncertainty score0.482

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.196
Teacher spread0.191 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it