MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336546044 · doi:10.1149/1.3205773

Investigation of Sr-doped and Sr-free LaMn<sub>1-y</sub>CryO<sub>3{plus minus}δ</sub> Perovskites as Sulfur Tolerant SOFC Anodes

2009· article· en· W2336546044 on OpenAlexaff
Lisa Deleebeeck, Viola Birss

Bibliographic record

VenueECS Transactions · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel Cells
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydrogenPerovskite (structure)StoichiometryGravimetric analysisSinteringMaterials scienceCatalysisInorganic chemistryRedoxPermanganateDopingElectrochemistryTemperature-programmed reductionTitrationAnalytical Chemistry (journal)ChemistryPhysical chemistryMetallurgyCrystallographyElectrode

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Sr-doped and Sr-free La1-xSrxMn1-yCryO3{plus minus}δ (LSMC) perovskite-type oxides were synthesized and tested for use as intermediate temperature anodes for SOFC applications. Thermo-chemical and chemical stabilities were tested in hydrogen and low ppm H2S: H2 at 800åC. Relative reducibility was determined by temperature program reduction using thermo-gravimetric analysis. This was correlated with oxygen non-stoichiometry determined by permanganate titration. The final phase after reduction at 1100åC was determined by powder X-ray diffraction and the ability of these materials to recover after reduction was tested by re-sintering in air. Electrochemical testing revealed catalytic activity towards hydrogen as a function of changing sintering temperature and operating temperature, as well as Sr and Cr content LSMC materials were found to be chemical stable in upto 10 ppm H2S in humidified hydrogen at 800åC, and Sr-free LMC materials were shown to have reasonable catalytic activity towards the hydrogen oxidation reaction at 700 and 800åC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueECS TransactionsSame topicAdvancements in Solid Oxide Fuel CellsFrench-language works237,207