MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336550165 · doi:10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04230

Bottom-Up Proteomics (2013–2015): Keeping up in the Era of Systems Biology

2015· review· en· W2336550165 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Janice Mayne, Zhibin Ning, Xu Zhang, Amanda E. Starr, Rui Chen, Shelley A. Deeke, Cheng‐Kang Chiang, Bo Xu, Ming Wen, Kai Cheng, Deeptee Seebun, Alexandra T. Star, Jasmine I. Moore, Daniel Figeys

Bibliographic record

VenueAnalytical Chemistry · 2015
Typereview
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Ottawa
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsCitationLibrary scienceAltmetricsPhoneComputer scienceWorld Wide WebPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ADVERTISEMENT RETURN TO ISSUEPREVReviewNEXTBottom-Up Proteomics (2013–2015): Keeping up in the Era of Systems BiologyJanice Mayne, Zhibin Ning, Xu Zhang, Amanda E. Starr, Rui Chen, Shelley Deeke, Cheng-Kang Chiang, Bo Xu, Ming Wen, Kai Cheng, Deeptee Seebun, Alexandra Star, Jasmine I. Moore, and Daniel Figeys*View Author Information Ottawa Institute of Systems Biology, Department of Biochemistry, Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ottawa, 451 Smyth Rd., Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H8M5*Phone: 613-562-5800 ext. 8674. Fax: 613-562-5655. E-mail: [email protected]Cite this: Anal. Chem. 2016, 88, 1, 95–121Publication Date (Web):November 11, 2015Publication History Published online24 November 2015Published inissue 5 January 2016https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04230https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.5b04230review-articleACS PublicationsCopyright © 2015 American Chemical SocietyRequest reuse permissionsArticle Views3926Altmetric-Citations53LEARN ABOUT THESE METRICSArticle Views are the COUNTER-compliant sum of full text article downloads since November 2008 (both PDF and HTML) across all institutions and individuals. These metrics are regularly updated to reflect usage leading up to the last few days.Citations are the number of other articles citing this article, calculated by Crossref and updated daily. Find more information about Crossref citation counts.The Altmetric Attention Score is a quantitative measure of the attention that a research article has received online. Clicking on the donut icon will load a page at altmetric.com with additional details about the score and the social media presence for the given article. Find more information on the Altmetric Attention Score and how the score is calculated. Share Add toView InAdd Full Text with ReferenceAdd Description ExportRISCitationCitation and abstractCitation and referencesMore Options Share onFacebookTwitterWechatLinked InRedditEmail Other access optionsGet e-Alertsclose SUBJECTS:Bacteria,Biological databases,Peptides and proteins,Protein identification,Proteomics Get e-Alerts

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: Review
Teacher disagreement score0.955
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.376
Teacher spread0.322 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations64
Published2015
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnalytical ChemistrySame topicAdvanced Proteomics Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207