MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336591696 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22514

Slotted plate device to measure the yield stress of biofluids

2016· article· en· W2336591696 on OpenAlexaffvenue
D. De Kée, David A. Rice, Cindy Leissinger, Bin Meng

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemical Engineering
TopicRheology and Fluid Dynamics Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsYield (engineering)RheometerDragComputational fluid dynamicsMaterials scienceStress (linguistics)Measure (data warehouse)MechanicsMechanical engineeringStructural engineeringComposite materialComputer scienceEngineeringPhysicsRheology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The slotted plate device by Zhu et al.1,2 was redesigned to allow for the measurement of very low yield stress values that occur with complex biofluids. The newly built apparatus improves the force measurement with a balance of fine resolution and smooths the vertical motion via a lab jack. The slotted plate geometry was optimized to further reduce wall slip as well as pressure drag via computational fluid dynamics (CFD). To improve on the yield stress measurement accuracy, the new design has a large slot area ratio and a large number of slots, as well as sharp front and rear edges. Test results for a few structured fluids, including blood, are compared with yield stress values determined via a TA Instruments AR‐2000 rheometer.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicRheology and Fluid Dynamics StudiesFrench-language works237,207