Effect of Maternal Responsiveness on Young Infants' Social Bidding‐Like Behavior during the Still Face Task
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The effect of maternal responsiveness on infants' emergence of social bidding‐like behavior during the Still Face Task was examined longitudinally at the infant ages of one week, one month, two months, and three months. Infants' social behaviors of smiling or making non‐distress vocalizations while looking at the mother during the still face phase significantly increased when infants were two months of age. These social bidding‐like behaviors at two and three months correlated with maternal responsiveness in the initial interactive phase of the Still Face Task on the concurrent and previous visits and with infants' positive social behaviors in the initial interactive phase at two and three months. Regression analyses indicate that maternal vocal responsiveness on the concurrent visit was the sole predictor of infants' social bidding‐like behavior at two months and was the major predictor of such infant behavior at three months. Maternal responsiveness enhances infants' awareness that they are effective agents in instigating social interaction, as suggested by infants' social behaviors toward their mothers when the mothers are unresponsive. This awareness is present by the infant age of two months. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".