MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336675218 · doi:10.1002/cjce.22521

Benefits of microwave heating method in production of activated carbon

2016· article· en· W2336675218 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Azadeh B. Namazi, D. Grant Allen, Charles Q. Jia

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicMicrowave-Assisted Synthesis and Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsActivation energyMicrowaveCharActivated carbonYield (engineering)ChemistryReaction rateMaterials scienceChemical engineeringNuclear chemistryCatalysisOrganic chemistryPyrolysisComposite materialAdsorption

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract This work investigates the chemical activation of a biochar sample using microwaves with KOH and NaOH. The activation of char samples was carried out in a microwave oven operating at 2.45 GHz with a power input of 1200 W. The specific surface area (SSA), yield (%), and pore size distribution were studied for microwave activation with KOH and NaOH. In microwave‐assisted activation, the activation yields for NaOH and KOH activation were in the ranges of 40–70 % and 60–80 %, respectively. The NaOH‐activation takes 1.5 h in a furnace to fabricate an activated carbon with a SSA of 2600 m2 · g−1. However, in microwave activation, a 5 min activation with a power of 1200 W results in activated carbon with a SSA of 1900 m2 g−1. The activation yield and SSA are mainly controlled by impregnation ratio in microwave‐assisted activation because KOH and NaOH were the sources of heat for the activation reaction. In this work, the microwave activation increased the reaction rate by 15 times compared to the furnace activation. Microwaves have a “non‐thermal effect” on the kinetic parameters of chemical activation reactions. This effect was more evident in the case of NaOH microwave activation, probably because it is a more reactive compound compared to KOH.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.210
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations34
Published2016
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicMicrowave-Assisted Synthesis and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207