MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336787713

Cell growth and topoisomerase IIα inhibitory activity of the bacterial metabolites kinamycin C and kinamycin A

2005· article· en· W2336787713 on OpenAlexaffabout
Xing Wu, Gary I. Dmitrienko, Valerie J. Goodfellow, Otunola Adedayo, Radek S. Laufer, Jack C. Yalowich, Brian B. Hasinoff

Bibliographic record

VenueCancer Research · 2005
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicCancer therapeutics and mechanisms
Canadian institutionsUniversity of ManitobaUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTopoisomeraseDithiothreitolMolecular biologyGrowth inhibitionApoptosisCell growthBiochemistryFlow cytometryChemistryAnnexinK562 cellsBiologyDNAEnzyme
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res, Volume 46, 2005 2392 The antibiotics kinamycin C (KC) and kinamycin A (KA) are naturally occurring bacterial metabolites isolated from Streptomyces murayamaensis that contain an unusual and potentially reactive diazo side chain. Although the antimicrobial activity of the kinamycins has been described, the mechanism of inhibition of cell growth by these compounds is unknown. Our results show that KC and KA strongly inhibit the growth of the human erythroleukemic K562 cells ( IC 50 of 0.2 and 0.3 μM, respectively). A short drug treatment of the cells also resulted in strong growth inhibition indicating a rapid onset of action. KC rapidly induced apoptosis in K562 cells as measured by flow cytometry using annexin V-FITC staining and PI staining of DNA content. When synchronized CHO cells were treated with KA, the cells were able to exit G0 and traverse the first G2/M phase, but were not able to enter the second G2/M phase. KC and KA also inhibited the catalytic activity of purified human DNA topoisomerase IIα (topo II), but not that of topoisomerase I. Preincubation of KC with topo II reduced topo II activity, indicating that KC may have inhibited topo II through a direct reaction. The inhibitory activities of KC and KA were modulated by the presence of dithiothreitol (DTT) in the assay mixture as an increase in the DTT concentration (from 0.1 to 250 μM) in the reaction mixture increased the IC 50 of KC from 9 to 108 μM, and of KA from 8 to 66 μM. Based on the ability of DTT to partially protect topo II from inhibition by these compounds, the possibility that these compounds inhibit by reacting with critical thiol groups on topo II is being explored. Neither KC nor KA were able to cross-link DNA, nor did they bind to DNA, which indicated that these compounds did not act directly on DNA. KA and KC were also examined for their ability to stabilize a DNA-topo II covalent complex and act as a topoisomerase IIα poison by measuring their ability to cleave pBR322 DNA to produce linear DNA. Neither KA nor KC induced DNA cleavage and, thus, it was concluded that they did not act as topo II poisons. Also the growth inhibitory effects of KC and KA on K562 and K/VP.5 cells (containing one-fifth the topo II content of the parental K562 cells) were not significantly different, a result that is also consistent with these compounds exerting their activity by mechanisms distinct from topo II poisoning. In summary these results indicate that even though KC and KA inhibited topo II catalytic activity, this may not be the mechanism by which they inhibited cell growth. Support: CIHR and a Canada Research Chair in Drug Development to BH, NSERC through a Discovery Grant to GID and ROI CA90787 to JCY.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCancer ResearchSame topicCancer therapeutics and mechanismsFrench-language works237,207