MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336799189 · doi:10.1049/iet-map.2015.0667

Paraffin wax‐based dielectric lens for metamaterial measurement in the S‐band

2016· article· en· W2336799189 on OpenAlexaff
Behnam Zarghooni, Abdolmehdi Dadgarpour, Tayeb A. Denidni

Bibliographic record

VenueIET Microwaves Antennas & Propagation · 2016
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications
Canadian institutionsInstitut National de la Recherche ScientifiqueUniversité du Québec à MontréalPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMetamaterialMaterials scienceLens (geology)OpticsHorn antennaDielectricFrench hornParaffin waxMetamaterial antennaAntenna (radio)Spiral (railway)OptoelectronicsWaxAcousticsComposite materialMechanical engineeringEngineeringElectrical engineeringCoaxial antennaDirectional antennaSlot antennaPhysicsMicrostrip antenna

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the paraffin wax is used in a moulding process to fabricate two dielectric lenses with the diameter of 24 inches for metamaterial measurement in the S‐band (1–4 GHz) using the free‐space method. The moulding process guarantees the lower cost and ease of implementation compared to the conventional machining procedure. To verify the lens performance, the two fabricated samples are used to measure the S ‐parameters of a well‐known spiral metamaterial unit cell. In this process, a three‐dimensional prototype of the unit cell is fabricated and placed between two standard horn antennas facing each other, and the dielectric lenses are used in front of the each horn antenna to ensure that the metamaterial prototype is correctly illuminated by the incident wave. This experiment provides a very good agreement with the simulation and confirms that the lens structure works properly.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.483

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.052
GPT teacher head0.263
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2016
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIET Microwaves Antennas & PropagationSame topicMetamaterials and Metasurfaces ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207