MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W2336805623 · doi:10.1109/allerton.2015.7447031

Dispatching thermal power plants under water constraints

2015· article· en· W2336805623 on OpenAlexaff
Dariush Fooladivanda, Joshua A. Taylor

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWater-Energy-Food Nexus Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHydropowerElectricity generationElectricityComputer scienceMathematical optimizationThermal power stationEnvironmental scienceWater scarcityPower (physics)Environmental economicsWater resourcesEngineeringMathematicsEconomicsWaste managementElectrical engineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Climate change has exposed the vulnerability of power utilities to low water availability for hydropower generation and to high river temperatures for thermoelectric power plants. In this study, we focus on a region whose power system is controlled by an operator that relies on a set of thermal power plants to generate electricity, and consider the conventional economic dispatch problem in the presence of cooling water scarcity and climate change constraints. Specifically, we consider water constraints on the amount of water that can be consumed by the power plants, and heat constraints on the amount of heat that be transferred to the environment by the thermoelectric power plants. We focus on a practical scenario in which the power plants are aligned on a river shared by all the power plants. We then propose a general optimal power flow (OPF) framework. The proposed economic dispatch problem is NP-hard. We have developed numerical techniques to compute sub-optimal solutions to the proposed problem. Finally, we show the impact of climate change (i.e., water availability and heat constraints) on electricity generation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.016

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.214
Teacher spread0.192 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater-Energy-Food Nexus StudiesFrench-language works237,207