S. Cusack and W. Thompson. Mental Fitness for Life: Seven Steps to Healthy Aging. Toronto, ON: Key Porter, 2003.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
RÉSUMÉ Cet ouvrage, qui s'adresse aux personnes âgées, présente un programme favorisant le fonctionnement mental optimal. Parmi les sujets abordés on retrouve l'instauration d'objectifs, la pensée constructive, la créativité, l'apprentissage et la mémoire, et l'affirmation de ses opinions. En général, il promeut une disposition de vie caractérisée par l'optimisme, la flexibilité mentale, la confiance en soi, et l'humour. Ce livre communique son message avec enthousiasme et dans un langage accessible au grand public. De nombreux exemples, des citations de même que des exercices stimulants facilitent la progression dans le programme et l'application des conseils formulés. Même s'il contient quelques simplifications et exagérations, ce livre est fortement recommandé non seulement pour les personnes âgées mais aussi pour les éducateurs, les professionnels de la santé, et les étudiants de toutes les disciplines de la gérontologie.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.007 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.004 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.036 | 0.011 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".